How Might Socio-Economic Aspects Impact the Settlement Patterns of Haitians and Jamaicans in U.S. Cities? Focus on New York and Miami Metropolitan Areas

The topic of the mosaic patterns of the settlement of ethnic minorities in US cities has been studied in depth. Many works proceed from the optics of studying inequality, which, in the American context, is often explained by overlapping patterns of ethnoracial discrimination. In this regard, groups at the intersection of inequality patterns are of great interest—for example, non-white immigrants and their descendants. This article analyzes the settlement of two such groups—Haitians and Jamaicans—at the state, county, and census tract levels in the two main population centers for the following two groups: New York and Miami metropolitan areas. The authors pose the question of whether Haitians and Jamaicans fundamentally differ from African Americans in terms of settlement patterns and socio-economic status. It is established that these two population groups are highly concentrated on a nationwide scale (in the states of Florida and New York) and in some counties (comprising metropolitan areas of New York and Miami). The authors carried out a spatial correlation (LISA) analysis to identify areas of concentration of Haitians and Jamaicans in the two above-mentioned metropolitan areas. Three distinct Haitian areas, three mixed Haitian/Jamaican, and one distinct Jamaican area are found in New York. In the Miami metropolitan area, three mixed Haitian/Jamaican areas are identified, as well as one Haitian area. Calculation of the Darden–Kamel Composite Socio-Economic Index was used to assess the socio-economic status of these areas and to compare it with that in the areas of concentration of African Americans. The analysis revealed that the areas of concentration of Haitians and Jamaicans are relatively disadvantaged in their socio-economic status, but to a lesser extent than those of African Americans. The study also established the following pattern: in the New York metropolitan area, the higher socio-economic status is a feature of the mixed Haitian/Jamaican areas of concentration in the central city, while in Miami, the higher socio-economic status is observed in the Jamaican areas in the suburbs. Beyond these empirical findings, this article offers a contextual perspective on inequality among non-white migrant groups as they settle near established African American communities. The novelty of our approach to the research problem relates to the idea that communities of African Americans, Haitians, and Jamaicans are quite variable in time and space—in particular, due to the non-simultaneous settlement of these groups in the metropolitan areas under consideration. Our most important conclusion is the discovery of the relationship between the stage of the beginning of the integration of the groups considered into urban communities and their socio-economic status at that moment. The later the group began integration, the fewer discriminatory practices it had to face, which led to a higher socio-economic status.

Авторы
Журнал
Издательство
MDPI
Номер выпуска
3
Язык
Английский
Страницы
59
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
9
Год
2025
Организации
  • 1 Department of Regional Economics and Geography, Faculty of Economics, RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), 117198 Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Vysokovsky Graduate School of Urbanism, Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Social Geography Department, Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SASA), 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Ключевые слова
Haitians; Jamaicans; African Americans; USA; spatial concentration; socio-economic status; settlements patterns
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

И Аньжань
Вестник Чувашского государственного педагогического университета им. И.Я. Яковлева. Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Чувашский государственный педагогический университет им. И.Я. Яковлева. Том 126. 2025. 7 с.