A brief review of the FDA dissolution methods database

The FDA Dissolution Database was reviewed using the following criteria: dosage forms, apparatus, rotation/pulsation speed, dissolution media, sampling time points, and trends for special dosage forms. In July 2015, there were 1084 drug products in the database, more than 50% thereof in tablet form. The paddle (Apparatus 2) is the most common apparatus in the database and is recommended for 488 products (45%). Rotation speeds listed in the database are 35-200 rpm for Apparatus 1 and 25-200 rpm for Apparatus 2. Deaerated or degassed water is recommended for 114 methods. The pH values for the most commonly cited dissolution media are in the range of 1-7.5; however, several dissolution methods have pH values that are out of physiological range (pH 12 for celecoxib capsules, pH 9.5 for glyburide tablets, pH 8.0 for Rabeprazole Sodium Tablets, pH 7.8 for Glimepiride Tablets). © 2016, Dissolution Technologies Inc. All rights reserved.

Авторы
Shohin I.E.1 , Grebenkin D.Y. 2 , Malashenko E.A.3 , Stanishevskii Y.M. 2 , Ramenskaya G.V.3
Издательство
Dissolution Technologies Inc
Номер выпуска
3
Язык
Английский
Страницы
6-10
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
23
Год
2016
Организации
  • 1 Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics Ltd, 20, Nauchniy Proezd, Moscow, 117246, Russian Federation
  • 2 Institute of Biochemical Technology and Nanotechnology Peoples’ Friendship, University of Russia, 10-2, Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
  • 3 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8, Trubetskaya st, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Dissolution; Dissolution apparatus; Dissolution methods database; FDA
Дата создания
19.10.2018
Дата изменения
19.10.2018
Постоянная ссылка
https://repository.rudn.ru/ru/records/article/record/3868/
Поделиться

Другие записи

Kosheleva Y.A., Medvedeva S.M., Shikhaliev K.S., Zubkov F.I., Ryzhkova E.A., Prezent M.A.
Химия гетероциклических соединений. Латвийский институт органического синтеза Латвийской академии наук / Springer New York Consultants Bureau. Том 52. 2016. С. 578-582