Shower thoughts: why scientists should spend more time in the rain
AbstractStormwater is a vital resource and dynamic driver of terrestrial ecosystem processes. However, processes controlling interactions during and shortly after storms are often poorly seen and poorly sensed when direct observations are substituted with technological ones. We discuss how human observations complement technological ones and the benefits of scientists spending more time in the storm. Human observation can reveal ephemeral storm-related phenomena such as biogeochemical hot moments, organismal responses, and sedimentary processes that can then be explored in greater resolution using sensors and virtual experiments. Storm-related phenomena trigger lasting, oversized impacts on hydrologic and biogeochemical processes, organismal traits or functions, and ecosystem services at all scales. We provide examples of phenomena in forests, across disciplines and scales, that have been overlooked in past research to inspire mindful, holistic observation of ecosystems during storms. We conclude that technological observations alone are insufficient to trace the process complexity and unpredictability of fleeting biogeochemical or ecological events without the shower thoughts produced by scientists’ human sensory and cognitive systems during storms.
1 Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences at Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
2 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science at the University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
3 Savannah River Ecology Lab and with the Warnell School of Forestry at the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
4 Department of Biology at Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
5 Terrestrial Ecology Research Group at the Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
6 Department of Water Management at the Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
7 Dipartimento di Farmacia at the University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
8 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
9 Research Applications Laboratory, at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, United States
10 Department of Soil Science of Temperate Systems, Agricultural Soil Science, at Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
11 Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
12 National Public Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
13 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, at the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
14 Department of City and Metropolitan Planning and with the Natural History Museum of Utah at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
15 Department of Biology at Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
16 Department of Minerals and Earth Sciences at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
17 Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, United States
18 Department of Biosciences at Mangalore University, Konaje, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
19 Departments of Marine and Environmental Science, Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
20 Independent Scholar Savannah, Georgia, United States
Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены.
Открытое акционерное общество Всероссийский центр изучения общественного мнения.
2023.
С. 3-16