G.W. LEIBNIZ: FROM THE “SYMBOLIC REVOLUTION” IN MATHEMATICS TO THE CONCEPT OF SUPPOSITIVE COGNITION [Г.Ф. ЛЕЙБНИЦ: ОТ «СИМВОЛЬНОЙ РЕВОЛЮЦИИ» В МАТЕМАТИКЕ К КОНЦЕПЦИИ ЗАМЕЩАЮЩЕГО ЗНАНИЯ]

The transition from the exclusive use of words to the predominant use of symbols in mathematics continued for centuries, but by the seventeenth century it turned out to be explosive. This phenomenon became known as the “symbolic revolution” in mathematics. One of its main outcomes was the discovery of mathematical analysis almost simultaneously and independently by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. To both scientists their discovery served as the basis for far-reaching philosophical generalizations. For Leibniz, it led to the concept of suppositive cognition, the opposite of the prevailing notions at that time. He was the first to argue that the criterion of clarity and distinctness in cognition is impossible, because it relies on intuition about primary concepts, but these are in fact confuse and undistinct, and the foundation of such cognition is shaky. Using the successful use of symbols in mathematics as a model, Leibniz arrives at the concept of blind or symbolic cognition, cognitio caeca, which makes it possible to achieve validity and verifiability of results without reliance on intuition or primary concepts. The truthfulness of the result is found to depend more on grammar, which determines the substitution rules of some signs, or characters, for others, than on the connection between signs and the signified. Leibniz’s opening debate served as a prologue to the fundamental modernization of scientific discourse in the early Modern Time. Although he failed to achieve entirely his philosophical goals, the concept itself turned out to be extremely productive and modern, effectively decoupling the progress of natural science from its philosophical foundations. This innovative cognitive ideology opened up enormous prospects for the formation and accumulation of new knowledge, closed by the rigid requirements of the Cartesian paradigm of science still dominant in Leibniz’s time. © 2022 RAS Institute of Philosophy. All rights reserved.

Authors
Bayuk D.A.1, 2 , Fedorova O.B. 3
Publisher
RUSSIAN ACAD SCIENCES-INST PHILOSOPHY
Number of issue
2
Language
Russian
Pages
201-217
Status
Published
Volume
59
Year
2022
Organizations
  • 1 Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskii Ave, Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
  • 2 Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Russian Academy of Science, 14 Baltiiskaya St., Moscow, 125315, Russian Federation
  • 3 People’s Friendship University of Russia, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
Keywords
Cartesian paradigm; characteristica universalis; Early Modern science; Leibniz; suppositive cognition; symbolic revolution
Date of creation
06.07.2022
Date of change
06.07.2022
Short link
https://repository.rudn.ru/en/records/article/record/83957/
Share

Other records

Gordon K.B., Saburov V.O., Koryakin S.N., Gulidov I.A., Fatkhudinov T.K., Arutyunyan I.V., Kaprin A.D., Solov’ev A.N.
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. New York Consultants BureauSpringer / Автономная некоммерческая организация Издательство Российской академии медицинских наук. Vol. 173. 2022. P. 281-285