"russian idea" of f.M. dostoevsky: From soilness to universality

The author reveals Fyodor Dostoevsky's works main features, his importance for Russian and world philosophy. The researcher analyzes the concept of "Russian Idea" introduced by Dostoyevsky, which became a study subject in Russian philosophy's subsequent history. The polemics that arose regarding the characteristics of Dostoevsky's soilness (Pochvennichestvo) ideology and his interpretation of the Russian Idea in his Pushkin Speech and subsequent comments in A Writer's Diary are unveiled. The author concludes that Dostoevsky overcomes the limitations of soilness and comes to universalism. The universal for him does not have a rootless cosmopolitan character but is born from the national's heyday. Diversity adorns the truth, and national diversity enamels humankind. People's real unity is in that all-human value that is found in the highest examples of each national culture. The truth is not in rootless cosmopolitanism or nationalism — it is in the "golden mean," which, in our opinion, the writer-philosopher sought to express. Dostoevsky wanted to rise above the dispute, to recognize the points of view of the Slavophiles and Westernizers as one-sided, to get out of any particularity to universality. © Nizhnikov S.A., 2021.

Авторы
Издательство
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН)
Номер выпуска
1
Язык
Английский
Страницы
15-24
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
25
Год
2021
Организации
  • 1 Peoples' Friendship, University of Russia (RUDN University), 6, Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
All-human; Anthropology of hesychasm; Dostoevsky; Nationality; Russian idea; Soilness; Universality
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

Pskhu R.V., Paribok A.V., Dekabrsky A.A.
Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Философия. Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН). Том 25. 2021. С. 179-187