Improving submissions to scholarly journals via peer review

Due to their commitment to better publishing standards and desire to improve their journals' academic reputation, editorial boards, editors, and editorial teams seek to refine submissions they receive. Though, the peer review process serves as a filtering and assessment system, it is believed to greatly contribute to better quality of scholarly journals. Based on the analysis of the peer review internationally, the JLE editors focus on the peer review in the Journal of Language and Education, sharing their experience with the JLE potential authors. The editorial contains some reflections on the efficacy of peer review in the JLE. Potential authors may find some tips as to how to interact with recommendations and criticism on part of their peer reviewers and to make their voices heard. © 2021 National Research University Higher School of Economics. All rights reserved.

Авторы
Номер выпуска
2
Язык
Английский
Страницы
5-9
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
7
Год
2021
Организации
  • 1 Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Russian Federation
  • 2 National Research University Higher School of Economics, MGIMO University, Russian Federation
  • 3 Moscow State Institute of International Relations, MGIMO University, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Editor; Original article; Peer review; Peer reviewer; Scholarly communication; Scholarly journal; Submission
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

Norezzine A., Ahmad Alabdallah Z., Anatolyevich Vatnikov Y., Alekseevich Nikishov A., Vladimirovich Kulikov E., Ravilievna Gurina R., Alexandrovna Krotova E., Il'Yasovna Khairova N., Ivanovna Semenova V., Valerievna Magdeeva T., Yuryevna Sapego N.
Archives of Razi Institute. Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute. Том 76. 2021. С. 667-680