METHODOLOGICAL INDIVIDUALISM VERSUS SOCIAL REALISM: IS THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS POSSIBLE?

One of the meaning-forming axes that builds the theoretical landscape of modern social sciences is still the dialectical problem of «subject (action, agency) — structure». The main thesis of this article is the assertion that the voluntarism of human action («freedom of will») is inevitably, that is, naturally, woven into a network of structures of different levels and orders («internal» and «external», micro-and macro-, cultural and institutional, axiological and normative), forming a number of conditions and prerequisites for the reproduction of organized forms of social interactions and relationships, and also acting as sources of explicit and latent rule-based behavior of people in society. The author adopts a theoretical and methodological approach that is oriented toward «synthetic» sociological concepts and shows its potential for combining the «realist» and «nominalist» perspectives of analyzing social life and overcoming their internal logical contradictions. © 2025, Russian Public Opinion Research Center, VCIOM. All rights reserved.

Авторы
Podvoyskiy
Издательство
Russian Public Opinion Research Center, VCIOM
Номер выпуска
4
Язык
Русский
Страницы
247-263
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
2025
Год
2025
Организации
  • 1 Department of History of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russian Federation
  • 2 Department of History of Philosophy, RUDN University, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russian Federation
  • 3 Department of Social Philosophy and Philosophy of History, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
AGIL-principle; contingency; methodological individualism; nominalism; realism; social action; social interaction; social structure; «Ego — Alter» problem
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи