What is to be done? In the age of ignorance

This paper is dedicated to the issue of collective guilt and the interconnection between theoretical political thinking and ethically grounded political action, collective guilt, and personal responsibility. It assumes that facing political events in a form of media representation (such as with the war conflict in Ukraine), we mostly deal with simulacra, which affects and creates passive shock content consumption instead of active participation. The interconnection between irrational and rational ways of interpretation of political conflict is shown together with the attempt to rethink the social responsibility of nowadays, switching the prospective from synchronic to diachronic dimensions. Instead of producing descriptions that multiply monstrous zombie/victims-blaming apocalyptic discourse or subconsciously continuing to symbolically support “fratricide”, it is proposed to think about the legacy for future generations and see the moral dimension of politics in terms of “adults’ responsibility for children” as each one’s personal responsibility issue. Acting “as if you would wish all children on Earth to grow in safety and deserve a happy life no matter where (s)he would be born, as if it were a universal law” – this is proposed as an ethical-political common-sense formula, based on potential equality and global interconnection, maturity, and care – which could lead to a common goal of overcoming starvation, wars, sufferings, and catastrophes.

Авторы
Издательство
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers B.V.
Номер выпуска
4
Язык
Английский
Страницы
557-564
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
74
Год
2022
Организации
  • 1 RUDN University
Ключевые слова
collective guilt; personal responsibility; maturity; media war; simulacrum; ethical action; children; russia; ukraine; belarus; yemen; global peace
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи