Evaluation of effectiveness of the PlasmaJet surgical device in the treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer (PlaComOv-study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands

The most important goal for survival benefit of advanced stage ovarian cancer is to surgically remove all visible tumour, because complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS) has been shown to be associated with prolonged survival. In a remarkable number of women, CCS is very challenging. Especially in women with many small metastases on the peritoneum and intestinal surface, conventional CCS with electrosurgery is not able to be “complete” in removing safely all visible tumour. In this randomized controlled trail (RCT) we investigate whether the use of the PlasmaJet Surgical Device increases the rate of CCS, and whether this indeed leads to a longer progression free and overall survival. The main research question is: does the use of the PlasmaJet Surgical Device in surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer result in an increased number of complete cytoreductive surgeries when compared with conventional surgical techniques. Secondary study objectives are: 30-day morbidity, duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospitalisation, Quality of Life, disease-free survival, overall survival, percentage colostomy, cost-effectiveness. The study design is a multicentre single-blinded superiority RCT in two university and nine non-university hospitals in The Netherlands. Three hundred and thirty women undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage ovarian carcinoma (FIGO Stage IIIB-IV) will be randomized into two arms: use of the PlasmaJet (intervention group) versus the use of standard surgical instruments combined with electrocoagulation (control group). The primary outcome is the rate of complete cytoreductive surgery in both groups. Secondary study objectives are: 30-day morbidity, duration of surgery, blood loss, length of hospitalisation, Quality of Life, disease-free survival, overall survival, percentage colostomy, cost-effectiveness. Quality of life will be evaluated using validated questionnaires at baseline, at 1 and 6 months after surgery and at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years after surgery. We hypothesize the additional value of the use of the PlasmaJet in CCS for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. More knowledge about efficacy, side effects, recurrence rates, cost effectiveness and pathology findings after using the PlasmaJet Device is advocated. This RCT may aid in this void. Dutch Trial Register NTR6624 . Registered 18 August 2017. Medical Ethical Committee approval number: NL62035.078.17 (Medical Ethical Committee Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam).

Авторы
Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer G.M.1 , Hofhuis W. 2 , Reesink-Peters N.3 , Ewing-Graham P.C.1 , Schoots I.G.5 , Beltman J.J.6 , Piek J.M.J.7 , Baalbergen A.8 , Kooi G.S.9 , Van Haaften A.10 , Van Huisseling H.11 , Haans L.12 , Dorman M. , Van Beekhuizen H.J.1
Журнал
Издательство
BMC
Номер выпуска
1
Язык
Английский
Страницы
1-7
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
19
Год
2019
Организации
  • 1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • 4 Erasmus MC University Medical Center
  • 5 Leids University Medical Centre
  • 6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Cancer Institute
  • 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
  • 8 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital
  • 9 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haga Hospital
  • 10 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Groene Hart Hospital
  • 11 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haags Medical Centre
  • 12 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bravis Hospital
Ключевые слова
ovarian cancer; cytoreductive surgery; PlasmaJet device; quality of life; cost-effectiveness; histology
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

Schulten S.F., Enklaar R.A., Kluivers K.B., Van Leijsen S.A., Jansen-van der Weide M.C., Adang E.M., Van Bavel Jeroen, Van Dongen Heleen, Gerritse M.B., Van Gestel Iris, Malmberg G.G., Mouw R.J., Van Rumpt-van de Geest D.A., Spaans W.A., Van der Steen Annemarie, Stekelenburg Jelle, Tiersma E.S., Verkleij-Hagoort A.C., Vollebregt Astrid, Weemhoff Mirjam, Van Eijndhoven H.W., Wingen C.B.
BMC Women's Health. BioMed Central. Том 19. 2019. С. 1-8