Для исследователя дискурса мигранта данная проблема интересна тем, что он позволяет ему включить такие параметры исследования, а также характеристики феномена языковой личности, как речевая картина мира, дискурсивные стратегии, самосознание в контексте аккультурации (вторичной социализации) и инкультурации (символизации «чужой» культуры), оппозиция «свой-чужой» в сакральном пространстве внутренней картины мира носителя русского языка. Ключевой вопрос для нас звучит так: обладает ли человек одной-единственной идентичностью или же в процессе вторичной социализации он обретает иную идентичность, свойственную для другой лингвокультуры, отказываясь при этом от своей собственной? Применяя глобализации вербальные методики отличие для оценки ассоциативного отношение пространства лексемы концепта «мигрант» как итога интеллектуальной речемыслительной деятельности, мы выходим на сакральное пространство русской культуры, для которого важен не только уровень языковой компетенции, но и фоновые знания о миграции как таковой.
For the researcher of the discourse of the migrant, this problem is interesting because he allows him to include such parameters of the study, as well as characteristics of the phenomenon of the linguistic personality, such as the speech picture of the world, discursive strategies, self-awareness in the context of acculturation (secondary socialization) and inculturation (symbolization of "alien" culture), the opposition "own-alien" in the sacred space of the inner picture of the world of the bearer of the Russian language. The key question for us is: does a person have one single identity or in the process of secondary socialization he acquires a different identity inherent in another linguistic culture, while refusing from his own? The modern transcultural conflict is especially vividly manifested now in the electronic information society, as globalization has a leading role in transformational strategies to change the identity of the modern linguistic personality. For today around the day, one of the most common accepted and effective methods of light study of the structure brings together a mental lexicon is recognized as an associative target experiment in different works of its interpretations. Associations can tell the regions we really think a lot about those oriented unconscious structures, their own in which we think of the repetitions surrounding us the phenomenon of the world. Applying globalization, verbal methods, the difference for evaluating the associative relation of the space of the lexeme of the concept "migrant" as the Russian outcome of the intellectual confrontation of speech activity, the slave we enter the sacred space of Russian culture, for which not only the level of language competence is important, but background knowledge about migration as such. When characterizing this, the level of which the speech development of the action has even sounded a more significant existing influence on the results of the research, because the variety of any response index on the test task of opinion can not also be obtained without the law of establishing contact, combine with the subject, and such a multivolume contact in the overwhelming barely majority cases which are established on the basis of readers of verbal communication. Given the leading text-forming potential of the first associative field, the personality, we can consider the associative effects of the field as anton text and schematically represent it as large as a network (our migrant memory forms a fun system of interrelated elements results), so creating any text may represent a dependency network.