Long-term active restoration of extremely degraded alpine grassland accelerated turnover and increased stability of soil carbon

Soil nutrient contents and organic carbon (C) stability are key indicators for restoration of degraded grassland. However, the effects of long-term active restoration of extremely degraded grassland on soil parameters have been equivocal. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of active restoration of degraded alpine grassland on: (a) soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization; and (b) the importance of biotic factors for temperature sensitivity (Q10) of SOM mineralization. Soils were sampled from intact, degraded and restored alpine grasslands at altitudes ranging between 3,900 and 4,200 m on the Tibetan Plateau. The samples were incubated at 5, 15 and 25°C, and Q10 values of SOM mineralization were determined. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the importance of vegetation, soil physico-chemical properties and microbial parameters for Q10 regulation. The Q10 of N mineralization was similar among intact, degraded and restored soils (0.84–1.24) and was higher in topsoil (1.09) than in subsoil (0.92). The best predictive factor of CO2-Q10 for intact grassland was microbial biomass, for degraded grassland was basal microbial respiration, and for restored grassland was soil bulk density. Restoration by planting vegetation decreased the Q10 of SOM mineralization as soil bulk density, the most important negative predictor, increased in restored grassland. The Q10 of SOM mineralization in topsoil was 14% higher than in subsoil because of higher microbial abundance and exo-enzyme activities. The NH4+ content was greatest in intact soil, while NO3− content was greatest in degraded soil. The SOM mineralization rate decreased with grassland degradation and increased after long-term (>10 years) restoration. In conclusion, extremely degraded grassland needs proper long-term management in active restoration projects, especially for improvement of soil nutrients in a harsh environment. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Authors
Bai Y.1 , Ma L. 1 , Degen A.A.2 , Rafiq M.K.3, 4 , Kuzyakov Y. 5, 6, 7 , Zhao J.8 , Zhang R.9 , Zhang T.1 , Wang W.1 , Li X. 1 , Long R.1 , Shang Z.1, 10
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Language
English
Status
Published
Year
2020
Organizations
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • 2 Desert Animal Adaptations and Husbandry, Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
  • 3 Rangeland Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • 4 UK Biochar Research Centre, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 5 Department of Agricultural Soil Science, Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany
  • 6 Agro-Technological Institute, RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 7 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation
  • 8 State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Institute of Innovation Ecology & College of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  • 9 Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
  • 10 Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration Ecology of Cold Area, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Xining, China
Keywords
active restoration; soil organic matter mineralization; soil warming; structural equation model; Tibetan grassland; topsoil and subsoil
Share

Other records

Zhukov O.B., Bragina E.E., Levina A.V., Evdokimov V.V., Terushkin R.А., Akramov M.M., Shakhov A.S., Vasilyev A.E.
Андрология и генитальная хирургия. Некоммерческое партнерство "Профессиональная Ассоциация Андрологов". Vol. 21. 2020. P. 26-35