Effects of tillage on soil organic carbon and crop yield under straw return

No-tillage with straw mulch is an effective way to achieve soil sustainability. However, the specific redistributions of soil organic carbon composition, stocks, and crop yield remain unclear. The hypothesis that no-tillage had a minor effect on soil organic carbon stocks in 0–50 cm but decreased crop yield compared to plow-tillage under straw return was tested in this study. Soils properties from two decades of rice-wheat rotation field experiment were related to the yield of rice and wheat depending on tillage: 1) plow-tillage without straw return, 2) no-tillage with straw mulch, and 3) plow-tillage with straw return. No-tillage with straw mulch had the highest mean weight diameter of soil aggregates, the contents of macro-aggregates (>0.25 mm) organic carbon, particulate organic carbon (>53 µm), and soil organic carbon across tillage practices in 0–5 cm. However, it decreased the contents of macro-aggregates (>0.25 mm) organic carbon in 5–15 cm, the particulate organic carbon in 5–50 cm, and soil organic carbon in 5–30 cm compared to plow tillage with straw return due to less carbon input from roots and straw. Organic carbon stocks in micro-aggregates (<0.25 mm) and mineral-associated organic matter (<53 µm) did not vary between tillage practices. Hence the soil organic carbon stocks of plow tillage without straw return (48 Mg ha−1) were similar to that of no-tillage with straw mulch (51 Mg ha−1) but lower than that of plow tillage with straw return (57 Mg ha−1) in 0–50 cm. The mean annual yields of wheat and rice under no-tillage with straw mulch (14 t ha−1) were lower than that of plow tillage without straw return (15 t ha−1) and plow tillage with straw return (16 t ha−1). No-tillage-induced high soil bulk densities limited the rice yields. The yield losses of no-tillage with straw mulch were higher in rice than in wheat. The rice yield losses of no-tillage with straw mulch compared to plow tillage with straw return increased with experiment duration due to decreased available nitrogen in 7–14 cm and phosphorus contents in 0–14 cm over time. Conclusively, plow-tillage is more efficient for carbon sequestration and yield increase than no-tillage under straw return in rice-wheat farming by increasing carbon input in deep soils, soil available nutrients, and decreasing soil compactness. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Authors
Zhang X. , Wang J. , Feng X. , Yang H. , Li Y. , Yakov K. , Liu S. , Li F.-M.
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Language
English
Status
Published
Number
108543
Volume
354
Year
2023
Organizations
  • 1 Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production co-sponsored by Province and Ministry, College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, China
  • 3 Linze Inland River Basin Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
  • 4 Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, Department of Agricultural Soil Science, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany
  • 5 Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
  • 6 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420049, Russian Federation
Keywords
Crop productivity; Long-term field experiments; Soil organic carbon accumulation; Straw management; Tillage practices
Share

Other records