Источник повышенной опасности: физические и правовые признаки

В российском законодательстве отсутствует четкая дефиниция источника повышенной опасности. Из дефиниции ст. 1079 ГК РФ не ясно, что считать в качестве такового: физический объект, деятельность или же их сочетание. Это не позволяет судам однозначно квалифицировать деликт по ст. 1079 ГК РФ. Предпринята попытка определить свойства источника повышенной опасности, разработана раздельная дефиниция каждого его вида.

The clear definition of the term source of risen hazard (SoRH) lacks in Russian legislation. The definition given in cl. 1079 of Russian Civil Code does not clearly explain whether either the SoRH as an object, as a work or both combined can be determined as those having the SoRH properties. This allows the courts in justice process to correspond the cl. 1079 of RCC or not depending on subjective judge's viewpoint. Furthermore, the SoRH variety such as risen hazardous object property is not involved in the legislator's concept. Such SoRH variety exists in nature, but cannot be determined neither as SoRH object nor SoRH work, because the thing described as risen hazardous object properties in terms of SoRH variety is initially safe in each rational mode of its use. Only several time later such an object peculiarities wrongly or due to low object given by producer to it indicate the SoRH properties. The apparent definition for each of SoRH varieties is advanced. It will allow the courts in justice process to address uniformly the cl. 1079 of RCC to check civil torts