Dialectics of a.F. losev and g.w.f. hegel

The article provides a comparative analysis of the understanding of dialectics by A.F. Losev and G.W.F. Hegel. Both the commonality of approaches and fundamental differences are revealed here. Both thinkers consider dialectics as a universal philosophical method of cognition. At the same time, Losev, in his interpretation, returns to Plato, in whom the dialectic begins with “one” and “the other” (dialogue "Parmenides"), and not “being” and “nothing” (“Science of Logic” by Hegel). The Russian thinker goes beyond the boundaries of Hegel’s rationalism, affirming the anagogic (uplifting) and, in its completion, the apophatic nature of dialectics, which ascends to the transcendent source. “Absolute dialectics” from him, acquiring this or that content, appears as metaphysics – “absolute mythology”. As a result of this, thought again meets being, the empty content, formalism and abstractness of thinking are overcome. Losev revealed the ontological potential of Platonism, freeing dialectics from nihilistic interpretation. Studying hesychasm allowed him to overcome both impersonalism and the determinism of Hegel’s logic: The basis of dialectics is not negativity, not nothing, but the creativity of the personal principle. © 2021, Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Авторы
Издательство
Izdatel'stvo Nauka
Номер выпуска
6
Язык
Русский
Страницы
36-44
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
2021
Год
2021
Организации
  • 1 Department “History of Philosophy”, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-University), 6, Miklukho-Maklay strMoscow 117198, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Absolute; Being; Dialectics; Hegel; Logic; Losev; Mythology; Pantheism; Platonism; The transcendent
Дата создания
20.07.2021
Дата изменения
20.07.2021
Постоянная ссылка
https://repository.rudn.ru/ru/records/article/record/74400/
Поделиться

Другие записи