Comparative analysis of the efficacy of different surgical techniques for the correction of grade II–III anterior vaginal wall prolapse

Objective. To conduct a comparative analysis of the efficacy of different surgical techniques for the correction of grade II–III anterior vaginal wall prolapse in sexually active patients of reproductive and perimenopausal ages. Patients and methods. The study included 79 patients of reproductive and perimenopausal ages with grade II–III anterior vaginal wall prolapse. All patients were divided into three groups depending on surgical technique: group 1 (n = 25) – surgical correction of prolapse using titanium mesh implants and 4 soft tissue fixators (“anchors”) according to the developed original technique; group 2 (n = 26) – surgical correction of prolapse using standard polypropylene implants; group 3 (n = 28) – correction with native tissues only. Results. At 1 month after surgery, about 50% of patients in each group reported irregular crampy pain in the inguinal and femoral region and/or perineum. Frequent urination was observed in 20% of patients in group 1, in 23% in group 2 and in 21.4% in group 3. At 6 and 12 months after surgery, 19.2% of patients in group 2 complained of bloody vaginal discharge, vaginal discomfort, painful intercourse, and partner’s negative reaction due to painful intercourse. Gynecological examination revealed erosion in the anterior vaginal wall and endoprosthesis extrusion, which required partial excision of the implant followed by restoration of the integrity of the anterior vaginal wall. Recurrence of grade II–III genital prolapse was diagnosed in 24–36 months in 25% of patients in group 3, in 7.7% in group 2, and in 1 (4%) in group 1, which did not require repeat surgical intervention. Conclusion. The use of individually sized titanium mesh implants together with titanium fixators (“anchors”) for the correction of grade II–III anterior vaginal wall prolapse is preferable to other surgical techniques. © 2024, Dynasty Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Авторы
Komarova A.D. , Ishchenko A.I. , Kazantsev A.A. , Ishchenko A.A. , Khokhlova I.D. , Dzhibladze T.A. , Gorbenko O.Yu. , Malyuta E.G. , Baburin D.V. , Balyasin M.V. , Moskvicheva A.P. , Pyatkina A.N. , Alekseeva A.A. , Azydova K.R.
Издательство
Dynasty Publishing House
Номер выпуска
4
Язык
Русский
Страницы
24-31
Статус
Опубликовано
Том
23
Год
2024
Организации
  • 1 I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No 1, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 2 Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 3 Treatment and Rehabilitation Center, Center of Gynecology and New Reproductive Technologies, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 4 Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), Moscow, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
polypropylene; adult; anterior vaginal wall prolapse; Article; climacterium; comparative effectiveness; controlled study; device removal; dyspareunia; endoprosthesis extrusion; female; human; inguinal pain; intermethod comparison; major clinical study; mesh complication; pollakisuria; surgical technique; vagina discharge (disease); vaginal discomfort
Цитировать
Поделиться

Другие записи

Kobalava Z., Safarova A.F., Tolkacheva V., Cabello-Montoya F.E., Zorya O.T., Nazarov I.S., Lapshin A.A., Smirnov I.P., Khutsishvili N.I., Vatsik-Gorodetskaya M.
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Том 121. 2024.