Advancing insights into recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A comparative analysis of surgical approaches and a new classification

Background: The management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) lacks a consensus. Consequently, the choice between repeat microdiscectomy (MD) without fusion, discectomy with fusion, or endoscopic discectomy without fusion typically hinges on the surgeon's expertise. This study conducts a comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes among these three techniques and proposes a straightforward classification system for rLDH aimed at optimizing management. Patients and Methods: We examined the patients treated for rLDH at our institution. Based on the presence of facet resection, Modic-2 changes, and segmental instability, they patients were categorized into three groups: Types I, II, and III rLDH managed by repeat MD without fusion, MD with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (MD + TLIF), and transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TFED), respectively. Results: A total of 127 patients were included: 52 underwent MD + TLIF, 50 underwent MD alone, and 25 underwent TFED. Recurrence rates were 20%, 12%, and 0% for MD alone, TFED, and MD + TLIF, respectively. A facetectomy exceeding 75% correlated with an 84.6% recurrence risk, while segmental instability correlated with a 100% recurrence rate. Modic-2 changes were identified in 86.7% and 100% of patients experiencing recurrence following MD and TFED, respectively. TFED exhibited the lowest risk of durotomy (4%), the shortest operative time (70.80 ± 16.5), the least blood loss (33.60 ± 8.1), and the most favorable Visual Analog Scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index quality of life assessment at 2 years. No statistically significant differences were observed in these parameters between MD alone and MD + TLIF. Based on this analysis, a novel classification system for recurrent disc herniation was proposed. Conclusion: In young patients without segmental instability, prior facetectomy, and Modic-2 changes, TFED was available should take precedence over repeat MD alone. However, for patients with segmental instability, MD + TLIF is recommended. The suggested classification system has the potential to enhance patient selection and overall outcomes. © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

Authors
Musa G. , Abakirov M. , Chmutin G. , Mamyrbaev S. , Ramirez M. , Sichizya K. , Kim A. , Antonov G. , Chmutin E. , Hovrin D. , Slabov M. , Chaurasia B.
Publisher
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. ООО
Number of issue
1
Language
English
Pages
66-72
Status
Published
Volume
15
Year
2024
Organizations
  • 1 Department of Neurological Diseases and Neurosurgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) Named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
  • 3 Department of Neurosurgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
  • 4 Department of Neurosurgery, City Clinical Hospital 68 Named after Demihov, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 5 Department of Neurosurgery, City Clinical Hospital Named after C.C. Yudina, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 6 Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal
Keywords
Endoscopic discectomy; facetectomy; microdiscectomy; Modic changes; segmental instability; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Other records